Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) versus NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 versus 17 May 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 12x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 32
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 25 Watt
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 versus 1887
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 versus 1887
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 3505
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 3505
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 32 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 25 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2278 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 215 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9425 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 989 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GP108 |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 17 May 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 884 | 905 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
