Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P630

  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1163 MHz
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 4 GB
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1163 MHz
Maximum memory size 128 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000

  • 2.3x more core clock speed: 796 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
  • Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4000 vs 2075
  • Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 333
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14591 vs 5648
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 vs 20.49
  • Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.056 vs 387.561
  • Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.697 vs 2.089
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.796 vs 24.713
  • 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.868 vs 37.743
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5523 vs 2010
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2273
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3019
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5523 vs 2010
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2273
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3019
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 796 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4000 vs 2075
PassMark - G2D Mark 565 vs 333
Geekbench - OpenCL 14591 vs 5648
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55.048 vs 20.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 639.056 vs 387.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.697 vs 2.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.796 vs 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 225.868 vs 37.743
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5523 vs 2010
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3684 vs 2273
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3325 vs 3019
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5523 vs 2010
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3684 vs 2273
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3325 vs 3019

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2075
4000
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
333
565
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5648
14591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20.49
55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
387.561
639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.089
3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.713
35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37.743
225.868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2010
5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2273
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3019
3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2010
5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2273
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3019
3325
Name Intel UHD Graphics P630 NVIDIA Quadro M2000
PassMark - G3D Mark 2075 4000
PassMark - G2D Mark 333 565
Geekbench - OpenCL 5648 14591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.49 55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 387.561 639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.089 3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.713 35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 37.743 225.868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2010 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2273 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3019 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2010 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2273 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3019 3325

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics P630 NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Essentials

Place in performance rating 1082 572
Type Desktop Workstation
Architecture Maxwell 2.0
Code name GM206
Launch date 8 April 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $437.75
Price now $409.99
Value for money (0-100) 13.23

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1163 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 796 MHz
Pipelines 24 768
Floating-point performance 1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm
Texture fill rate 56.64 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt
Transistor count 2,940 million

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 128 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 201 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Width 1" (2.5 cm)