Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon R7 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P630

• 64x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 vs 5648
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.508 vs 20.49
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 387.561
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 vs 2.089
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 24.713
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 37.743
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 2010
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 2273
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3019
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 2010
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 2273
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3019

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5648 7787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.49 25.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	387.561 647.813
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.089 2.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.713 44.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.743 109.558
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2010 2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2273 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3019 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2010 2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2273 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3019 3358

Compare specifications (specs)