NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 609.1 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 67% higher maximum memory size: 40 GB vs 24 GB
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200716 vs 191142
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 27823 vs 3713
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 27823 vs 3713
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 51880 vs 3354
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 51880 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 40 GB vs 24 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200716 vs 191142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 52% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 6912
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 21006
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 21006
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 14 May 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 6912 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 21006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 21006 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 200716 | 191142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21006 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21006 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 | 3354 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26670 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 711.408 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5528.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 228.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2431.277 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA100 | GA102 |
Launch date | 14 May 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 6 | 48 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.49 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6912 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 225.6 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 54200 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX | 12.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 40 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1555 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 5120 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR6X |