NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD FireStream 9170
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 30HX and AMD FireStream 9170 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 30HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 12273.4x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 12.8 GTexel / s
- 4.4x more pipelines: 1408 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 8 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 12.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9170
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 30HX
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9170
Name | NVIDIA CMP 30HX | AMD FireStream 9170 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68128 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 647 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX | AMD FireStream 9170 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | TU116 | RV670 |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 8 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 294 | 296 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1408 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 12.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 666 million |
Floating-point performance | 512.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |