NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 30HX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 30HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 8401.1x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 4x more pipelines: 1408 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1200 MHz
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 25 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 352 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 30HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Name | NVIDIA CMP 30HX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68128 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1617 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | TU116 | GF100 |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 25 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 299 | 297 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1408 | 352 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 18.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |