NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 30HX and AMD Radeon R9 M485X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 30HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 1697.6x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M485X
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 30HX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Name | NVIDIA CMP 30HX | AMD Radeon R9 M485X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67806 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3661 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX | AMD Radeon R9 M485X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU116 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 293 | 291 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Enduro |