NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 40HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 40HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 94577 vs 75589
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94577 vs 75589 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 185 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 40HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA CMP 40HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 94577 | 75589 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11541 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6789 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU106 |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 179 | 180 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1185 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 885 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 105.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 237.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |