NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 5.4x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 13481.8x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 2x 2 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 110 nm
- 40x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 2x 128 MB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 9 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 2x 2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 2x 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440
- 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440
Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47181 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 38 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Curie |
Code name | TU102 | NV43 A4 |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 9 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 460 | 459 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $96.99 | |
Price now | $93.61 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 2x 2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 18600 million | 146 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 187 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 2x 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 2x 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |