NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 30895.8x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- 11.2x more pipelines: 3584 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 80 nm
- 20x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz
| Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 12 December 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 320 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
| Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52254 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA CMP 50HX | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
| Code name | TU102 | R600 |
| Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 12 December 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 404 | 407 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18600 million | 720 million |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 241 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 118.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 320 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR4 |
