NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 22815.4x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 13 billion / sec
- 56x more pipelines: 3584 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 65 nm
- 10x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 13 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 64 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
| Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52254 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 504 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
| Code name | TU102 | G94 |
| Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 3 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 404 | 402 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 64 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 13 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18600 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 128 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||

