NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 90HX and NVIDIA CMP 50HX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 90HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 342.0 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s
- Around 79% higher pipelines: 6400 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
| Launch date | 28 Jul 2021 vs 24 Jun 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 342.0 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6400 vs 3584 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 320 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 90HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
| Name | NVIDIA CMP 90HX | NVIDIA CMP 50HX |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52254 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA CMP 90HX | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA102 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 28 Jul 2021 | 24 Jun 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 404 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 6400 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 136.8 GPixel/s | 123.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 342.0 GTexel/s | 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 18600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 116 mm, 4.6 inches |
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | 560.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 320 bit | 320 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |