NVIDIA GRID K340 vs AMD Radeon HD 6470M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K340 and AMD Radeon HD 6470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K340
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 76.9x more texture fill rate: 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 4x 384 vs 160
- 13x better floating-point performance: 4x 729.6 gflops vs 224 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4x 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.822 vs 2.282
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 411.582 vs 112.819
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.116 vs 0.276
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.441 vs 5.671
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.699 vs 23.025
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 729.6 gflops vs 224 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4x 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.822 vs 2.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 411.582 vs 112.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.116 vs 0.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.441 vs 5.671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.699 vs 23.025 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K340
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6470M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K340 | AMD Radeon HD 6470M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.822 | 2.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 411.582 | 112.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.116 | 0.276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.441 | 5.671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.699 | 23.025 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 226 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 105 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1251 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1251 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K340 | AMD Radeon HD 6470M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Seymour |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 4 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,299 | $569.99 |
Place in performance rating | 1576 | 1579 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Price now | $569.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4x 729.6 gflops | 224 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 384 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 5.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4x 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 4x 28.8 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4x 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |