NVIDIA GRID K340 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K340 and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GRID K340

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K340

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 73% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 550 MHz
48.9x more texture fill rate: 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 8.8 GTexel / s
48x more pipelines: 4x 384 vs 32
34.4x better floating-point performance: 4x 729.6 gflops vs 84.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
16x more maximum memory size: 4x 1 GB vs 256 MB
2.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz

Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 19 August 2008
Core clock speed	950 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate	4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 8.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4x 384 vs 32
Floating-point performance	4x 729.6 gflops vs 84.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	4x 1 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

9.8x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 225 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	23 Watt vs 225 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K340
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

Name	NVIDIA GRID K340	NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.822
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	411.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	36.699
PassMark - G3D Mark		137
PassMark - G2D Mark		57
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1465
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1465

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID K340	NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla
Code name	GK107	G96
Launch date	23 July 2013	19 August 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,299
Place in performance rating	1576	1573
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	950 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	4x 729.6 gflops	84.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	4x 384	32
Texture fill rate	4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec	8.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	23 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	314 million
CUDA cores		32
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Maximum VGA resolution		1920x1200
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4x 1 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	4x 28.8 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	4x 64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
PCI-E 2.0