NVIDIA GRID M40 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M40 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M40

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 38% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 675 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Launch date 18 May 2016 vs 14 August 2008
Core clock speed 930 MHz vs 675 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed 5400 MHz vs 2000 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M40
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Name NVIDIA GRID M40 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 576.664
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 87.629
PassMark - G3D Mark 575
PassMark - G2D Mark 42
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3272

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GRID M40 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Tesla
Code name GM107 G92
Launch date 18 May 2016 14 August 2008
Place in performance rating 1418 1413
Type Workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz 675 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 754 million
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops
Pipelines 128
Texture fill rate 43.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Memory clock speed 5400 MHz 2000 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0