NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and NVIDIA Tesla M60 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 557 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3526 vs 886
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3526 vs 886
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1791
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1791
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 557 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3526 vs 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3526 vs 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1791 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- 14.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 151.0 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2048
- 2x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 4,833 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7551 vs 5203
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 311
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8663 vs 5460
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8663 vs 5460
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 151.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 4,833 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7551 vs 5203 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 vs 311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 vs 5460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 vs 5460 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5203 | 7551 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5460 | 8663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5460 | 8663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3526 | 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3526 | 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 1791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 1791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 485 | 488 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q with others
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
NVIDIATesla M60
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20
