NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q versus NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and NVIDIA Tesla M60 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
- Environ 67% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 930 MHz versus 557 MHz
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3526 versus 886
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3526 versus 886
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 1791
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 1791
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz versus 557 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1180 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3526 versus 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3526 versus 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 1791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 1791 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M60
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 151.0 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2x 2048 versus 2048
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 4,833 gflops versus 4,833 gflops
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7551 versus 5203
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 versus 311
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8663 versus 5460
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8663 versus 5460
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 151.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,833 gflops versus 4,833 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7551 versus 5203 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 versus 311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 versus 5460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 versus 5460 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5203 | 7551 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5460 | 8663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5460 | 8663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3526 | 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3526 | 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 1791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 1791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GM204 | GM204 |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 485 | 488 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1180 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,833 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 151.0 GTexel / s | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2x 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.4 GB / s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
NVIDIATesla M60
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20
