NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and NVIDIA GeForce G210M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 31 vs 20
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 vs 15 June 2009 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 31 vs 20 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210M
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1402 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 48 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2881 vs 2438
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1294 vs 688
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1294 vs 688
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1402 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 48 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2881 vs 2438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1294 vs 688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1294 vs 688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G210M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | NVIDIA GeForce G210M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 117 | 117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 31 | 20 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 | 2881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | 1294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 | 1294 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | NVIDIA GeForce G210M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT218 |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 | 15 June 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
Place in performance rating | 1661 | 1663 |
Price now | $32.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz | 1500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | 16 |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 260 million |
Gigaflops | 72 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |