NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310M and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1402 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 48.96 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2949 vs 2438
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1167 vs 688
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1167 vs 688
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 12 October 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1402 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 vs 2438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 vs 688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 125 vs 121
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 31 vs 22
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 125 vs 121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 31 vs 22 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 | 125 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | 31 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 | 2438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 | 688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 | 688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT218 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 12 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1673 | 1662 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
Price now | $32.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1402 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | 16 |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 260 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |