NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 210

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
2.6x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 540 MHz
2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
Around 89% better floating-point performance: 39.36 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 117 vs 93
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 688 vs 494
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 688 vs 494

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 October 2009 vs 7 May 2009
Core clock speed	1402 MHz vs 540 MHz
Pipelines	16 vs 8
Floating-point performance	39.36 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	512 MB vs 256 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	117 vs 93
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	688 vs 494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	688 vs 494

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 4.32 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
2.8x more memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 500 MHz
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 31

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	4.32 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	23 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
Memory clock speed	1390 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	46 vs 31

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

117

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

688

494

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

688

494

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 210	NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
PassMark - G3D Mark	117	93
PassMark - G2D Mark	31	46
Geekbench - OpenCL	2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	688	494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	688	494

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 210	NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Essentials
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla
Code name	GT218	G98
Launch date	12 October 2009	7 May 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$29.49	$54.50
Place in performance rating	1661	1664
Price now	$32.99	$49.75
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	6.81	2.51
Technical info
Core clock speed	1402 MHz	540 MHz
CUDA cores	16
Floating-point performance	39.36 gflops	20.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C
Pipelines	16	8
Texture fill rate	4.16 GTexel / s	4.32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30.5 Watt	23 Watt
Transistor count	260 million	210 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort	2x DisplayPort
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Height	2.731" (6.9 cm)
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	6.60" (16.8 cm)	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	10.1	10.0
OpenGL	3.1	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	8.0 GB / s	11.12 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	1390 MHz
Memory type	GDDR2	GDDR3
Technologies
CUDA