NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 39.36 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 117 vs 93
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 688 vs 494
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 688 vs 494
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 vs 7 May 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 117 vs 93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 vs 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 vs 494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 4.32 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 31
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 vs 31 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 117 | 93 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 31 | 46 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 | 494 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G98 |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 | 7 May 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | $54.50 |
Place in performance rating | 1661 | 1664 |
Price now | $32.99 | $49.75 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | 2.51 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz | 540 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort | 2x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | 11.12 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1390 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |