AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6250 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
• Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1005 vs 688
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1005 vs 688

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 126 vs 94
• Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 1244
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 497 vs 444
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 497 vs 444

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	30 30
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	94 126
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1244 2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1005 688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1005 688

Compare specifications (specs)