NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 589 MHz vs 459 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 4.71 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 44.86 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 41 vs 32
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1052 vs 996
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1052 vs 996
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2009 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 589 MHz vs 459 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.71 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 44.86 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 vs 32 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1052 vs 996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1052 vs 996 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 31 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 666 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 149 vs 143
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 31 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 666 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 149 vs 143 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | 32 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 143 | 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1052 | 996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1052 | 996 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G86 |
Launch date | 27 November 2009 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1654 | 1657 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 459 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44.86 gflops | 29.376 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 4.71 GTexel / s | 3.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 229 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 5.33 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 666 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
SLI |