NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 105.6 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 156 vs 120
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4683 vs 2795
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1062 vs 1017
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1062 vs 1017
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 vs 120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 vs 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 vs 1017 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 56 vs 50
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 56 vs 50 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 56 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 | 120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 | 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 | 1017 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT218 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1629 | 1630 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 589 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops | 44.86 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s | 4.71 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 12.64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1580 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |