NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 105.6 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 198 vs 118
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4683 vs 2795
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1062 vs 1017
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1062 vs 1017
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 vs 118 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 vs 2795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 vs 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 vs 1017 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 55 vs 46
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 55 vs 46 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 | 55 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 | 118 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 | 2795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 | 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 | 1017 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GT218 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1635 | 1637 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 589 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops | 44.86 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s | 4.71 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 260 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 12.64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6150
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 3470
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 405 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 315M
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7290 IGP
