NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 315M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 105.6 gflops vs 38.78 gflops
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 36
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 198 vs 115
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4683 vs 2910
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 5 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops vs 38.78 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 vs 36 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 vs 115 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 vs 2910 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 589 MHz
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1401 vs 1062
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1401 vs 1062
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1212 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1401 vs 1062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1401 vs 1062 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 315M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 315M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 | 36 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 | 115 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 | 2910 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 | 1401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 | 1401 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 315M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT218 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1635 | 1636 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 1212 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops | 38.78 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s | 4.85 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 260 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |