NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 320M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 43
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2010 vs 10 January 2010 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 43 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 216 vs 210
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5251 vs 2474
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1903 vs 1735
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1903 vs 1735
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 216 vs 210 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5251 vs 2474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1903 vs 1735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1903 vs 1735 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 320M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 | 216 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 43 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2474 | 5251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 | 1903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 | 1903 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 320M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | MCP89 | GT216 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2010 | 10 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1577 | 1578 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 486 million | 486 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 121.44 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 182 | |
| Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 320M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 320M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GT
NVIDIAGeForce 320M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 580
NVIDIAGeForce 320M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330M
NVIDIAGeForce 320M vs
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
NVIDIAGeForce 320M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 425M
NVIDIAGeForce 320M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5770 X2
