NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 320M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 58 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 44
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1735 vs 1686
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1735 vs 1686
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2010 vs 26 January 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 58 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 44 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 vs 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 vs 1686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- 3x more core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 220 vs 210
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5892 vs 2474
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 vs 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 vs 2474 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 320M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 | 220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 44 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2474 | 5892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 | 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 | 1686 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 320M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | MCP89 | G94 |
Launch date | 1 April 2010 | 26 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1582 | 1583 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1360 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 58 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |