NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 320M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 210 vs 161
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 43
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1735 vs 1687
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1735 vs 1687
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2010 vs 9 April 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 vs 161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 43 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 vs 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 vs 1687 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 320M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 | 161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 43 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 | 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 | 1687 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 320M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | MCP89 | G96C |
Launch date | 1 April 2010 | 9 April 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1576 | 1578 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $59.46 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.88 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 32 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 314 million |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |