NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1796 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 149
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 523 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 vs 149 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
- 8.3x more pipelines: 400 vs 48
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 360.0 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 446 vs 290
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3776 vs 758
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1723
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1723
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops vs 100.42 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 446 vs 290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3776 vs 758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 1723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 1723 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 | 149 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 290 | 446 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 758 | 3776 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1254 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1254 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1723 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1723 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF119 | Madison |
Launch date | 29 September 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1361 | 1363 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.42 gflops | 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 4.18 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 627 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |