NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
4.3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 108 Watt
Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1796 MHz vs 1600 MHz
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 49

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	29 September 2011 vs 30 March 2009
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 108 Watt
Memory clock speed	1796 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	163 vs 49

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

Around 15% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 523 MHz
9.2x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
4.6x better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 825 vs 290
17.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 758
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3258 vs 1723
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3258 vs 1723

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	600 MHz vs 523 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.4 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
Pipelines	192 vs 48
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	825 vs 290
Geekbench - OpenCL	13337 vs 758
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3258 vs 1723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3258 vs 1723

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

163

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

290

825

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

758

13337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1723

3258

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1723

3258

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
PassMark - G2D Mark	163	49
PassMark - G3D Mark	290	825
Geekbench - OpenCL	758	13337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1723	3258
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1723	3258

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GF119	GT200B
Launch date	29 September 2011	30 March 2009
Place in performance rating	1361	1364
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$799
Price now		$109.99
Value for money (0-100)		9.89
Technical info
Core clock speed	523 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	100.42 gflops	462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	48	192
Texture fill rate	4.18 GTexel / s	38.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	108 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	1,400 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	198 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.37 GB / s	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1796 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3