NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6470M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1794 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 226
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 105
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 968 vs 729
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.566 vs 2.282
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 4 January 2011 |
Memory clock speed | 1794 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 vs 226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 vs 105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 968 vs 729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.566 vs 2.282 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6470M
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 523 MHz
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 5.6 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 224 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.819 vs 53.127
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.671 vs 4.47
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.025 vs 5.049
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1251 vs 764
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1881 vs 1131
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1251 vs 764
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1881 vs 1131
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 224 gflops vs 100.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.819 vs 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.671 vs 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.025 vs 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1251 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1881 vs 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1251 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1881 vs 1131 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6470M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6470M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 | 226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 | 105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 968 | 729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.566 | 2.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 53.127 | 112.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.47 | 5.671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.049 | 23.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 764 | 1251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1131 | 1881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 764 | 1251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1131 | 1881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.276 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 589 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6470M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF119 | Seymour |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1578 | 1579 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $569.99 | |
Price now | $569.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops | 224 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 4.184 GTexel / s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 292 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.35 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1794 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |