NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6470M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1794 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 226
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 105
  • Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 968 vs 729
  • Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.566 vs 2.282
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 April 2012 vs 4 January 2011
Memory clock speed 1794 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 320 vs 226
PassMark - G2D Mark 164 vs 105
Geekbench - OpenCL 968 vs 729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.566 vs 2.282

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6470M

  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 523 MHz
  • Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 5.6 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
  • 2.2x better floating-point performance: 224 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.819 vs 53.127
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.671 vs 4.47
  • 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.025 vs 5.049
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1251 vs 764
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1881 vs 1131
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1251 vs 764
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1881 vs 1131
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 700 MHz vs 523 MHz
Texture fill rate 5.6 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
Pipelines 160 vs 48
Floating-point performance 224 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 112.819 vs 53.127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.671 vs 4.47
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.025 vs 5.049
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1251 vs 764
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1881 vs 1131
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1251 vs 764
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1881 vs 1131

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6470M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
320
226
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
164
105
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
968
729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.566
2.282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
53.127
112.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.47
5.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.049
23.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
764
1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1131
1881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
764
1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1131
1881
Name NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM AMD Radeon HD 6470M
PassMark - G3D Mark 320 226
PassMark - G2D Mark 164 105
Geekbench - OpenCL 968 729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.566 2.282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 53.127 112.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 4.47 5.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.049 23.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 764 1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1131 1881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 764 1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1131 1881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.276
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 589
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 589

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM AMD Radeon HD 6470M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 TeraScale 2
Code name GF119 Seymour
Launch date 2 April 2012 4 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1578 1579
Type Desktop Laptop
Launch price (MSRP) $569.99
Price now $569.99
Value for money (0-100) 0.72

Technical info

Core clock speed 523 MHz 700 MHz
Floating-point performance 100.4 gflops 224 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 48 160
Texture fill rate 4.184 GTexel / s 5.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.35 GB / s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1794 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0