NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 315 and NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 164
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.025 vs 2.566
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 79.479 vs 53.127
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.705 vs 4.47
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.573 vs 5.049
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 942 vs 764
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1382 vs 1131
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 942 vs 764
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1382 vs 1131
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 March 2013 vs 2 April 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 vs 164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.025 vs 2.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 79.479 vs 53.127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.705 vs 4.47 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.573 vs 5.049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 942 vs 764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1382 vs 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 942 vs 764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1382 vs 1131 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1794 MHz vs 1750 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 968 vs 882
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1794 MHz vs 1750 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 968 vs 882 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA NVS 315 | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 | 320 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 | 164 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 882 | 968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.025 | 2.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 79.479 | 53.127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.217 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.705 | 4.47 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.573 | 5.049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 465 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 942 | 764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1382 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 465 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 942 | 764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1382 | 1131 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA NVS 315 | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GF119 | GF119 |
| Launch date | 10 March 2013 | 2 April 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1577 | 1578 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 523 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops | 100.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.184 GTexel / s | 4.184 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14 GB / s | 14.35 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1794 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA NVS 315 with others
NVIDIANVS 315 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7400
NVIDIANVS 315 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7300
NVIDIANVS 315 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5770 X2
NVIDIANVS 315 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6470M
NVIDIANVS 315 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 605 OEM
NVIDIANVS 315 vs
NVIDIAGRID K340
