NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 99% higher memory clock speed: 1794 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 284
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 54

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

• Around 72% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 523 MHz
• Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 billion / sec vs 4.184 GTexel / s
• Around 72% better floating-point performance: 172.8 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 25 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1490 vs 883
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.315 vs 2.566
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 122.375 vs 53.127
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.629 vs 4.47
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.403 vs 5.049
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1583 vs 764
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1639 vs 1131
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1583 vs 764
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1639 vs 1131

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	320 284
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	163 54
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	883 1490
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.566 3.315
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.127 122.375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.47 7.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.049 15.403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	764 1583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1131 1639
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	764 1583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1131 1639

Compare specifications (specs)