NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher memory clock speed: 1794 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 283
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 53
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 30 May 2011 |
Memory clock speed | 1794 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 vs 283 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 vs 53 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 523 MHz
- Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 billion / sec vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 172.8 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1490 vs 983
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.315 vs 2.566
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 122.375 vs 53.127
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.629 vs 4.47
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.403 vs 5.049
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1583 vs 764
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1639 vs 1131
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1583 vs 764
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1639 vs 1131
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 billion / sec vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 172.8 gflops vs 100.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1490 vs 983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.315 vs 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 122.375 vs 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.629 vs 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.403 vs 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1583 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1639 vs 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1583 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1639 vs 1131 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 | 283 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 | 53 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 983 | 1490 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.566 | 3.315 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 53.127 | 122.375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.47 | 7.629 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.049 | 15.403 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 764 | 1583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1131 | 1639 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 764 | 1583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1131 | 1639 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 692 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 692 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF119 | GF119 |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 30 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1571 | 1572 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops | 172.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.184 GTexel / s | 7.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.35 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1794 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |