NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 460 MHz
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 4.184 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
• 3.4x better floating-point performance: 100.4 gflops vs 29.44 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 38 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1794 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 233
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 166 vs 79
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1131 vs 858
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1131 vs 858

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	320 233
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	166 79
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1131 858
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1131 858

Compare specifications (specs)