NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
2.2x more memory clock speed: 1794 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 764 vs 719
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1131 vs 690
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 764 vs 719
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1131 vs 690

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 April 2012 vs 3 September 2010
Memory clock speed	1794 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	764 vs 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1131 vs 690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	764 vs 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1131 vs 690

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

2.1x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 523 MHz
Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 6.7 billion / sec vs 4.184 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
2.1x better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 25 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 320
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 163
Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1875 vs 983
Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.184 vs 2.566
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 172.058 vs 53.127
Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.145 vs 4.47
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.944 vs 5.049

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1120 MHz vs 523 MHz
Texture fill rate	6.7 billion / sec vs 4.184 GTexel / s
Pipelines	96 vs 48
Floating-point performance	215.04 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	23 Watt vs 25 Watt
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	523 vs 320
PassMark - G2D Mark	174 vs 163
Geekbench - OpenCL	1875 vs 983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.184 vs 2.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	172.058 vs 53.127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	8.145 vs 4.47
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	13.944 vs 5.049

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

320

523

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

163

174

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

983

1875

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.566

4.184

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.127

172.058

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.47

8.145

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.049

13.944

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

764

719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1131

690

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

764

719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1131

690

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
PassMark - G3D Mark	320	523
PassMark - G2D Mark	163	174
Geekbench - OpenCL	983	1875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.566	4.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	53.127	172.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	4.47	8.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	5.049	13.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	764	719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1131	690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	764	719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1131	690
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.459
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		859

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GF119	GF108
Launch date	2 April 2012	3 September 2010
Place in performance rating	1571	1574
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	523 MHz	1120 MHz
Floating-point performance	100.4 gflops	215.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	96
Texture fill rate	4.184 GTexel / s	6.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	23 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	585 million
CUDA cores		96
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.35 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1794 MHz	800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus