NVIDIA GeForce 810A vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810A and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 810A

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810A

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 601 MHz
6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt

Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed	775 MHz vs 601 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 100 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

3.9x more texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
5x more pipelines: 960 vs 192
3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 655
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 277
3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5986 vs 1828

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	48.08 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	960 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1978 vs 655
PassMark - G2D Mark	301 vs 277
Geekbench - OpenCL	5986 vs 1828

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

655

1978

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

277

301

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1828

5986

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 810A	NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	655	1978
PassMark - G2D Mark	277	301
Geekbench - OpenCL	1828	5986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		4470

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 810A	NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GK208	GK104
Launch date	22 July 2014	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	863	860
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz	601 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	960
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s	48.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count		3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	89.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0