NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel vs NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel and NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 68 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 47 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 512 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 512 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | |
Code name | MCP79 | MCP77MH MCP79MH |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1668 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes |