NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 30.11 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 247 vs 93
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 28 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 vs 93 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 960.0 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 960.0 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 vs 782 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 | 902 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 93 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GK208 | RV740 |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 28 April 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 794 | 796 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 203 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |