NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G vs ATI Radeon 9800 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G and ATI Radeon 9800 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 331 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 150 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 580 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 59 vs 24
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 331 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 59 vs 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 131 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | ATI Radeon 9800 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 59 | 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 542 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 542 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | ATI Radeon 9800 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 8 |
Code name | G86 | R350 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1204 | 1207 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 331 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 1.324 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Floppy |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 9.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 580 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 / GDDR2 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |