NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G vs NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 150 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 332 MHz
- 11.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 59 vs 5
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 vs 14 December 2003 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 332 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 59 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 131 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 59 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 542 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 542 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Celsius |
Code name | G86 | NV18 A4 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 14 December 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1204 | 1206 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 332 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 / GDDR2 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |