NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 610 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 15.3x more texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 30x more pipelines: 240 vs 8
- 48.6x better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 12.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 20.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1222 vs 59
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3319 vs 542
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3319 vs 542
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 vs 9 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 610 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 240 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops vs 12.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1222 vs 59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3319 vs 542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3319 vs 542 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
- 18.9x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 189 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 96
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 189 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 96 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1222 | 59 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 | 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3319 | 542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3319 | 542 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | G86 |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 | 9 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 1201 | 1203 |
Price now | $178.89 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 610 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 12.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 240 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 189 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 / GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |