NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 125
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 vs 1 August 2006 |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 125 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 6 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 12 vs 8
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 210 vs 59
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 12 vs 8 |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 vs 59 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 59 | 210 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 542 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 542 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G86 | G73 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 1 August 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1204 | 1206 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 12 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | 177 million |
Boost clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 / GDDR2 | 128 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |