NVIDIA GeForce 845M vs AMD Radeon E8860
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 845M and AMD Radeon E8860 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 27.62 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 883.7 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 37 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 22.387 vs 15.803
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.073 vs 47.86
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2320 vs 1246
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3287 vs 1655
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2320 vs 1246
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3287 vs 1655
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 August 2015 vs 25 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1071 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 37 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 vs 15.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 vs 47.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2320 vs 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 vs 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2320 vs 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 vs 1655 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 vs 1524
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 213
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 vs 6112
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.683 vs 1.295
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 3358
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1686 vs 1524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 vs 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26300 vs 6112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.683 vs 1.295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4345 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4345 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8860
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | AMD Radeon E8860 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 | 1686 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 436 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6112 | 26300 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | 1.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 | 15.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 | 47.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2320 | 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2320 | 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 529.248 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 845M | AMD Radeon E8860 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Venus |
Launch date | 26 August 2015 | 25 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1029 | 1031 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | 625 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1071 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 37 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |