NVIDIA GeForce 845M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 845M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 720 MHz
• Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 758 MHz
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2320 vs 1263
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3287 vs 2409
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3111
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2320 vs 1263
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3287 vs 2409
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 27.62 GTexel / s
• 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 883.7 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3252 vs 1489
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 204
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9400 vs 6112
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 vs 1.295
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 vs 22.387
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 vs 76.073

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1489 3252
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	204 345
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6112 9400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.295 2.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.387 40.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.073 99.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2320 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3287 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2320 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3287 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3111

Compare specifications (specs)