NVIDIA GeForce 845M vs AMD FirePro W4170M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 845M and AMD FirePro W4170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 27.62 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 883.7 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1489 vs 1056
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3287 vs 2802
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2689
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3287 vs 2802
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2689
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 August 2015 vs 28 April 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1489 vs 1056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 vs 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 vs 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2689 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 204
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6460 vs 6112
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 204 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 vs 6112 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4170M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | AMD FirePro W4170M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1489 | 1056 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 204 | 211 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6112 | 6460 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2320 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2320 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 845M | AMD FirePro W4170M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Mars |
| Launch date | 26 August 2015 | 28 April 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1015 | 1016 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||