NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 113 vs 104
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1267 vs 402
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1267 vs 402
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 December 2007 vs 1 June 2007 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 113 vs 104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1267 vs 402 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1267 vs 402 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 60 vs 28
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 60 vs 28 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 113 | 104 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 28 | 60 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1267 | 402 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1267 | 402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G84 | G84 |
Launch date | 31 December 2007 | 1 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1646 | 1649 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 60.8 gflops | 60.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s | 7.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 289 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, GDDR2 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |