NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX vs ATI Radeon 9000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX and ATI Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 576 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 36.8x more texture fill rate: 36.8 billion / sec vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 64 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 144.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 579 vs 4
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 November 2006 vs 1 July 2002 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion / sec vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 768 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 579 vs 4 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9000
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 155 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 123 vs 92
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 155 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 123 vs 92 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX | ATI Radeon 9000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 579 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX | ATI Radeon 9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 7 |
Code name | G80 | RV250 |
Launch date | 8 November 2006 | 1 July 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1291 | 1294 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 250 MHz |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion / sec | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 155 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 681 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 270 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
SLI |