NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS and NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 5.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 532 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 382 vs 123
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 vs 122
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 November 2007 vs 30 September 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 5.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 532 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 vs 123 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 vs 122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 | 123 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 | 122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1989 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1989 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
| Code name | G92 | NV48 |
| Launch date | 1 November 2007 | 30 September 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | 1276 | 1278 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 300 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 5.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-HE | AGP 8x |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 532 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||

