NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 26.78 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 384 vs 64
- 4x better floating-point performance: 642.8 gflops vs 160 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1097 vs 382
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 159
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1989
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1989
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 1 November 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 26.78 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops vs 160 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1097 vs 382 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 vs 159 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1989 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1989 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1097 | 382 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | 159 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3468 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.66 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.323 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1989 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1989 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 1 November 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1273 | 1276 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 160 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 26.78 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 280M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7400G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
