NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 164 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 33 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | MCP79MX | G96C |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1667 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
Price now | $85.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 89.6 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 6.875" (17.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 / 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |