NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 68 vs 50
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 47 vs 45
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 512 vs 392
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 512 vs 392
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 9 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 68 vs 50 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 47 vs 45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 512 vs 392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 512 vs 392 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 68 | 50 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 47 | 45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 512 | 392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 512 | 392 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Code name | MCP77MH MCP79MH | G86 |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1668 | 1674 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Architecture | Tesla | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | yes |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 9.5 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3, GDDR2 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Technologies |
||
nView |